To me this reads as a claim that Israel does not hold nukes, which is a stronger refutement than usual as usually Israel spokerspersons take a stance of ambiguity.
Question: Remind me, does Israel have nuclear weapons?
Answer: Look, Israel doesn't intend to introduce nuclear weapons, but if people are afraid that we have them, why not?
More surprising is that this contradicts a press conference in Jordan 1998, reported in the Jerusalem Post [http://www.jpost.com/LandedPages/PrintArticle.aspx?id=44774] where Peres stated that Israel had:
"built a nuclear option, not in order to have a Hiroshima but an Oslo."Not many people really believe that Israel does not have a nuclear weapon programme, and it seems rather futile trying to deny it any more.
So why does Israel continue to deny the existence of WMDs. Could it be that it makes it very difficult to question Iran's nuclear intentions?
I don't like the prospect of Iran holding WMDs but it makes it difficult for any country to take an even handed approach on this if they don't at the same time question Israel's nuclear programme. And it certainly isn't acceptable for any western country to support an Israeli attack on Iran when both countries are allegedly carrying out nuclear programmes.
Further reading - Israel's weapons of mass destruction - May 2005

